Ethnopharmacological Assessment of the Medicinal Plants of Agtas in Peñablanca, Cagayan, Philippines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21639863Keywords:
Agtas, ethnopharmacological assessment, medicinal plants, traditional medicine, phytochemical components, descriptive survey, ethnobotanical dataAbstract
This study highlights the Agtas’ utilization of ethnobotanicals as a treatment for different illnesses. Generally, the study aimed to conduct an ethnopharmacological assessment of the medicinal plants of Agtas in Peñablanca, Cagayan. A descriptive survey design was utilized; a semi-structured questionnaire was used for the survey with a total of 77 informants. The researchers provided phytochemical results of the medicinal plants from collated existing related literature. Of about 46 of 60 plant species mentioned by the informants, leaves were the most frequently used plant part (49.5%) and handpicking (63.1%) is the primary way of collecting the parts needed; the primary preparation method of medicinal plants used by the respondents was decoction (53.2%); on the basis of their primary uses, 17 of these plants were reported to relieve fever and wounds, and 12 for cough, and the more common route of administration of medicinal plants was internal (64.9%). Most of the medicinal plants were reactive to alkaloids, terpenoids and flavonoids. All the ailments were grouped into nine (9) disease categories, in which the urinary system disorders category had the highest Informant Consensus Factor value (0.97) that includes Persea americana (Avocado) for kidney stones and urinary
retention, and Blumea balsamifera (Sambong) for urinary tract infections. Parsonsia barbata Blume. (Sagid or Sadak) had the maximum Use Value (0.333); and Origanum vulgare (Oregano) had the highest Rank Order Priority (86) among the 14 medicinal plants that attained values above 50 (30.4%). To conclude, the study revealed that various medicinal plant species are still utilized to treat different ailments by the Agtas of Peñablanca, Cagayan that most of these were uncommon. A primary recommendation by the researchers is to perform firsthand comprehensive laboratory phytochemical analysis on the plants collected from the different locales.
References
Baddu, V. D. (2018). Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used by the Y’Apayaos of Sta. Praxedes in the province of Cagayan, Philippines. Mindanao Journal of Science and Technology, 16(1), 1–26. https://mjst.ustp.edu.ph/index.php/mjst/article/view/148
Biodiversity Management Bureau. (2016). Status of Philippine biodiversity. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. https://www.bmb.gov.ph
Chikezie, C. P., Ojiako, O. A., & Nnnadi, A. C. (2015). Herbal medicine: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Alternative & Integrative Medicine, 4(3), Article 195. https://doi.org/10.4172/2327-5162.1000195
Morilla, L. J. G., Sumaya, N. H. N., Rivero, H. I., & Madamba, M. R. S. B. (2014, January). Medicinal plants of the Subanens in Dumingag, Zamboanga del Sur, Philippines. In International Conference on Food, Biological and Medical Sciences (Vol. 10, pp. 34–39). International Commission on Development.
Philippine Institute of Traditional and Alternative Health Care. (2017, February 20). Strategic plan 2017–2022: Call for proposals. University of the Philippines Manila. https://pitahc.gov.ph
Sharma, B. K. (2011). Ethnomedicine: Study of traditional medicine. Biotech Articles, 18(2), 30–31.
Tantengco, O. A. G., Condes, M. L. C., Estadilla, H. H. T., & Ragragio, E. M. (2018). Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used by Ayta communities in Dinalupihan, Bataan, Philippines. Pharmacognosy Journal, 10(5), 859–870. https://doi.org/10.5530/pj.2018.5.145
Tindowen, D. J. C. (2016). The economic life of the Aetas of Northern Philippines. Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 19(4), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.5782/2223-2621.2016.19.4.97
World Health Organization. (2004). Guidelines on safety monitoring of herbal medicines in pharmacovigilance systems.https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43034/9241592214_eng.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Karima Lex A. Caleda, Kim Charles L. Adsuara, David Jonathan T. Dollaga, Eldren Joi L. Malsi, Catherine Alexandra P. Melegrito, Jinky Marie T. Chua

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by the Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

