Defiance to Intellectual Honesty: An Investigation on Plagiarism Among CTE Students in Academic Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21639138Keywords:
Intellectual Honesty, Academic Writing, Knowledge on Plagiarism, Plagiarism, Practices Towards Plagiarism, Causes of Plagiarism, TurnitinAbstract
This research study investigates the prevalence of plagiarism among College of Teacher Education (CTE) student researchers and explores the contextual and situational factors contributing to this behavior. The research was conducted by evaluating the similarity rate of CTE student researchers' papers using Turnitin and administering a questionnaire to gauge their awareness and engagement in plagiarism. The findings reveal a high percentage of similarity rates among the research papers, with an average degree of similarity index of 53%. Surprisingly, despite receiving regular supervision from research advisers and undergoing a course on research and academic writing, CTE student researchers continue to produce papers with substantial similarities. The questionnaire responses indicate that 90.2% of the respondents are aware of what plagiarism entails; however, they still “sometimes” engage in plagiaristic practices. Furthermore, 97% acknowledge that using someone else's processes, results, or words without proper attribution is a form of plagiarism. The study highlights several reasons, as generated from interviews, why CTE student researchers engage in plagiarism. These include a tendency to disregard plagiarism detection software, copying others' work without paraphrasing, and directly copying and pasting sections from external sources without appropriate attribution or quotation marks. Contextual and situational factors such as the widespread availability of information and communication technology (ICT) and the Internet, lack of teacher control, attitude, and poor self competency contribute to students' defiance of intellectual honesty. In conclusion, despite possessing adequate knowledge about plagiarism, CTE student researchers still exhibit plagiaristic behaviors, as confirmed by both the Turnitin evaluation and the research questionnaire. Efforts to address these issues should consider improving students' understanding of ethical writing practices, enhancing academic writing skills, and implementing stricter controls to discourage plagiarism in CTE research papers.
References
Alsmari, N. A. (2020). An investigation into plagiarism among Saudi EFL students in writing research projects. The Asian ESP Journal, 16(5.1), 93–115
Bretag, T. (2013). Challenges in addressing plagiarism in education. PLOS Medicine, 10(12), e1001574. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001574
Chuang, C. Y., Craig, S. D., & Femiani, J. (2017). Detecting probable cheating during online assessments based on time delay and head pose. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(6), 1123–1137. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1303456
Comas-Forgas, R., & Sureda-Negre, J. (2010). Academic plagiarism: Explanatory factors from students' perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 8(3), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-010-9121-0
Committee on Publication Ethics. (1999). Guidelines on good publication practice. Oxford University Press.
Díaz, J. C. T., Montoliu, J. M. D., & Becerra, M. H. (2018). Plagiarism, internet and academic success at the university. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 7(2), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2018.7.324
Echanique, B. (2020). Students' knowledge of plagiarism: Basis for SPUP Honor Code framework. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(9), 4056–4070. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080931
Eret, E., & Ok, A. (2014). Internet plagiarism in higher education: Tendencies, triggering factors and reasons among teacher candidates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(8), 1002–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.880776
Fatima, A., Sunguh, K. K., Abbas, A., Mannan, A., & Hosseini, S. (2020). Impact of pressure, self-efficacy, and self-competency on students' plagiarism in higher education. Accountability in Research, 27(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1699070
Henning, M. A., Malpas, P., Manalo, E., Ram, S., Vijayakumar, V., & Hawken, S. J. (2015). Ethical learning experiences and engagement in academic dishonesty: A study of Asian and European pharmacy and medical students in New Zealand. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(1), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0172-7
Kayaoglu, M. N., Erbay, S., Flitner, C., & Saltas, D. (2015). Examining students' perceptions on plagiarism: A cross-cultural study at tertiary level. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 682–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2015.1014320
Larkham, P. J., & Manns, S. (2002). Plagiarism and its treatment in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26(4), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877022000021748
Šprajc, P., Urh, M., Jerebic, J., Trivan, D., & Jereb, E. (2017). Reasons for plagiarism in higher education. Organizacija, 50(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/orga-2017-0002
Thomas, J., Raynor, M., & McKinnon, M. (2014). Academic integrity and oral examination: An Arabian Gulf perspective. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(5), 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.796724
Thompson, L. W., Bagby, J. H., Sulak, T. N., Sheets, J., & Trepinski, T. M. (2017). The cultural elements of academic honesty. Journal of International Students, 7(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v7i1.249
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Fahrid Nat R. Taliping, Ma. Elizabeth P. Lana, Charlene Mae A. Pascual, Naneth G. Zinampan, Joselina A. Azucena

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by the Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

