“Abot Kamay and Pagsasanay”: Effectiveness of Tactual Learning Kit as a Localized Manipulative Instructional Material in Grade 1 Mathematics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21619573Keywords:
development, experiential learning, tactual learning kit, utilizationAbstract
Mathematics and numeracy are the foundations of critical thinking, creative thinking, spatial thinking, and problem-solving skills for learners to become effective citizens of the world. The development of innovative learning materials to cater to learners at the foundation stage is necessary in the teaching-learning process, especially in the time of the pandemic. This study endeavored to assess the effectiveness of the developed Tactual Learning Kit (TLK) as a Localized Instructional Material in Teaching Addition for Grade 1 Mathematics. The study used a quasi-pre-test-post-test-experimental research design. The development of the TLK as instructional material employed the use of the ADDIE Model. The learning material was piloted at Viga Elementary School, a multigrade school in the municipality of Lasam, Philippines. The participants of the study were the nine (9) systematically sampled Grade 1 pupils and the four (4) teacher-evaluators of Viga Elementary School. Results showed that the TLK as a learning material in Grade 1 Mathematics enhanced the cognitive performance of students, as shown with a large gain effect size. However, the attitude of the respondents before and after the use of TLK did not show a significant difference, but it still had a medium-sized gain effect. In like manner, the test of relationship using Spearman’s rho coefficient revealed that the respondents' mathematics post-test attitude is not associated with their post-test performance when using the TLK. Hence, future studies should look into the possibility of investigating this effect with the inclusion of other variables. Finally, according to the teacher-evaluators, the TLK was highly appropriate, acceptable, useful, and durable for Grade 1 students to learn the addition. For wider adoption and utilization, its enhancement and improvement were offered in order to upgrade the overall quality of the developed learning material.
References
Acharya, A. S., Prakash, A., Saxena, P., & Nigam, A. (2013). Sampling: Why and how of it. Indian Journal of Medical Specialties, 4(2), 330–333.
Agaton, C. B., & Cueto, L. J. (2021). Learning at home: Parents’ lived experiences on distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 901–911.
Ancheta, R., & Ancheta, H. (2020). The new normal in education: A challenge to the private basic education institutions in the Philippines. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 1(1).
Awofala, A. O. A., Lawal, R. F., Isiakpere, B. J., Arigbabu, A. A., & Fatade, A. O. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria and attitudes towards mathematics homeschooling among pre-tertiary students. Nigerian Online Journal of Educational Sciences and Technology, 1(2), 57–70.
Badri, M., Al Nuaimi, A., Guang, Y., Al Sheryani, Y., & Al Rashedi, A. (2018). The effects of home and school on children’s happiness: A structural equation model. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 12(1), 1–16.
Chow, C. (2017, April 24). What are tactile materials? Sciencing. https://www.sciencing.com/tactile-materials-7385789/
Department of Education. (2020). DepEd Order No. 032, s. 2020: Guidelines on the engagement of services of learning support aides to reinforce the implementation of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan in time of COVID-19 pandemic. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/DO_s2020_032-.pdf
Dewi, M. P., & Wajdi, M. B. N. (2021). Distance learning policy during pandemic COVID-19. EDUTEC: Journal of Education and Technology, 4(3), 325–333.
Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. D. (2021). Learning loss due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(17), Article e2022376118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022376118
Farhan, S., & Khan, I. (2015). Impact of stress, self-esteem and gender factor on students’ academic achievement. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(2), 143–156.
Fortuna, A. P., Rida, A. M., Maharani, L. S. P., Ardiansyah, R., & Sari, A. A. (2020, September). A needs analysis of digital connecting book in education in the pandemic era. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (pp. 1–5).
Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
Furner, J. M., & Worrell, N. L. (2017). The importance of using manipulatives in teaching math today. Transformations, 3(1), 2.
Garg, R., Levin, E., & Tremblay, L. (2016). Emotional intelligence: Impact on post-secondary academic achievement. Social Psychology of Education, 19(3), 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9338-x
Guhl, P. (2019). The impact of early math and numeracy skills on academic achievement in elementary school.
Haeck, C., & Lefebvre, P. (2020). Pandemic school closures may increase inequality in test scores. Canadian Public Policy, 46(S1), S82–S87. https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2020-055
Hodaňová, J., & Nocar, D. (2016, March). Mathematics importance in our life. In INTED2016 Proceedings (pp. 3086–3092).
Kontas, H. (2016). The effect of manipulatives on mathematics achievement and attitudes of secondary school students. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(3), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n3p10
Larbi, E., & Mavis, O. (2016). The use of manipulatives in mathematics education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(36), 53–61.
Lase, D., Zega, T. G. C., Daeli, D. O., & Zaluchu, S. E. (2022). Parents’ perceptions of distance learning during COVID-19 in rural Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 16(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v16i1.20122
Latri, L., Nonci, J., & Juhari, A. (2019). The development of elementary school mathematics learning packages assisted by manipulative media: Supporting qualified and creative primary teacher candidate programs. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of Science and Technology in Elementary Education (ICSTEE 2019). EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.14-9-2019.2290052
Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054
Liggett, R. S. (2017). The Impact of Use of Manipulatives on the Math Scores of Grade 2 Students. Brock Education Journal, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v26i2.607
Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., & Reber, S. (2017). Descriptive analysis in education: A guide for researchers (NCEE 2017-4023). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20174023/pdf/20174023.pdf
Longva, K. K., & Foss, L. (2018). Measuring impact through experimental design in entrepreneurship education: A literature review and research agenda. Industry and Higher Education, 32(6), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422218804912
Magsambol, B. (2019, December 4). Filipino students lagging behind in math, science in TIMSS international study 2019. Rappler. https://www.rappler.com/philippines/filipino-students-lagging-behind-math-science-timms-international-results-2019/
Magulod, G. C. (2017). Evaluation of multisensory instructional material package for elementary learners. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(4), 83–93.
McLeod, S. (2017). Kolb’s learning styles and experiential learning cycle. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html
Nylund-Gibson, K. (2017). The importance of early attitudes toward mathematics and science. Teachers College Record, 119(5), 1–32.
Ogunode, N. J. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on private secondary school teachers in FCT, Abuja, Nigeria. Electronic Research Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 3, 52–62.
Oymak, O., & Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. (2021). Comparison of students’ learning and attitudes in physical versus virtual manipulatives using inquiry-based instruction. IAFOR Journal of Education, 9(4), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.4.02
Parisi, S., Rognoli, V., & Sonneveld, M. (2017). Material tinkering: An inspirational approach for experiential learning and envisioning in product design education. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S1167–S1184. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353059
Roller, M. R., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2015). Applied qualitative research design: A total quality framework approach. Guilford Press.
Seeram, E. (2019). An overview of correlational research. Radiologic Technology, 91(2), 176–179.
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology: How to choose a sampling technique for research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 5(2), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035
Terry, B. H. (2012). Use of tactual materials on the achievement of content-specific vocabulary and terminology acquisition within an intermediate level science curriculum (Doctoral dissertation). St. John’s University, School of Education and Human Services.
Yeh, C. Y. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Chen, Z. H., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2019). Enhancing achievement and interest in mathematics learning through Math-Island. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0100-9
Yılmaz, D. U., & Sari, D. (2018). The use of moulage for providing “fidelity” in nursing education. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, 26(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.26650/FNJN.427141
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Prince Dave R. Llaneza and Gilbert C. Magulod Jr.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by the Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

